legal-news

Marquise Bailey Sues Spada Auto Services LLC Over Voluntary Dismissal

26-cv-02552
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Marquise Bailey's lawsuit against Spada Auto Services LLC was dismissed voluntarily. This means Spada Auto Services LLC chose to end the lawsuit without a court decision. The case was filed in the Northern District of Illinois.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
info
Other April 29, 2026

1:26-cv-02552 M & B Solutions, LLC v. Erie Insurance Company

Marquise Bailey's lawsuit against Spada Auto Services LLC was dismissed voluntarily. This means Spada Auto Services LLC chose to end the lawsuit without a court decision. The case was filed in the Northern District of Illinois.

info
Other April 29, 2026

1:26-cv-02552 Forest Hills Medical Services, P.C. v. United Healthcare Insurance Company

Spada Auto Services LLC was granted an extension of time to file an answer in the case Forest Hills Medical Services, P.C. v. United Healthcare Insurance Company (1:26-cv-02552). This means they now have more time to respond to the complaint. The extension was granted for 10 days.

info
Other April 28, 2026

2:26-cv-02552 Marquise Bailey v. Spada Auto Services LLC et al

Marquise Bailey voluntarily dismissed his case against Spada Auto Services LLC et al. This dismissal was made pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), which allows a plaintiff to dismiss their own case without a court order. The case, 2:26-cv-02552, is now closed.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

3 outlets · 3 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

2 days, 10 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.