Mark Williams et al v. Under Armour, Inc. et al
Case Summary
Mark Williams et al v. Under Armour, Inc. et al is tracked by Juryvine as a civil case. The available record places the matter in C.D. Cal.. The docket number on file is 24-cv-01567. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper analysis. Juryvine will update the summary as new court events, attorney appearances, and source documents are linked to the case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Docket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
5:24-cv-01567 Mark Williams et al v. Under Armour, Inc. et al
Other · May 13, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 13, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Under Armour, Inc, Mark Williams.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
1 event5:24-cv-01567 Mark Williams et al v. Under Armour, Inc. et al
The case Mark Williams et al v. Under Armour, Inc. et al was filed in the Central District of California under docket number 24-cv-01567. Currently, there are no significant filings, rulings, or media coverage to provide further details. Juryvine is monitoring the case and will update the summary when more information becomes available.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
59 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.