newspaper
4:26-cv-04248 v. National Specialty Insurance Company
Notice of Removal ( 1
May 8, 2026
1 min read
civil-litigation
real-estate
federal-courts
court-watch
ExtraSpace Storage Sued Over Deficiency in Filed Documents
26-cv-04248
C.D. Cal.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
A notice of removal was filed in the case involving ExtraSpace Storage. This filing indicates the case has been moved from a state court to a federal court. The reasons for removal are not specified.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Notice of removal
- • Federal court jurisdiction
- • ExtraSpace Storage litigation
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
4:26-cv-04248 v. National Specialty Insurance Company
Other · May 08, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
groups
Participants
2 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff
4 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 08, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes 700 E Slauson ExtraSpace Storage, National Specialty Insurance Company, 2:26-cv-04248 Mark Ingraham and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
chronic
Updated 15 hours, 36 minutes ago
The Story So Far
ExtraSpace Storage Sued Over Deficiency in Filed Documents is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 26-cv-04248.
The dispute currently identifies 2:26-cv-04248 Mark Ingraham on one side and 700 E Slauson ExtraSpace Storage on the other. The case is currently organized around deficiency in filed documents, ExtraSpace Storage, district court.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 23, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The plaintiff, Mark Ingraham, has filed a lawsuit against ExtraSpace Storage, alleging that the company failed to provide complete and accurate documents in a foreclosure proceeding. This deficiency in filed documents is a critical issue in the case, as it.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
smart_toy
Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline.
How we verify our work.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
2 events
info
Other
May 8, 2026
4:26-cv-04248 v. National Specialty Insurance Company
A Notice of Removal was filed.
info
Other
April 22, 2026
2:26-cv-04248 Mark Ingraham v. 700 E Slauson ExtraSpace Storage
The plaintiff, Mark Ingraham, has filed a lawsuit against ExtraSpace Storage, alleging that the company failed to provide complete and accurate documents in a foreclosure proceeding. This deficiency in filed documents is a critical issue in the case, as it may impact the validity of the foreclosure. The lawsuit seeks to address this deficiency and potentially impact the outcome of the foreclosure.
Advertisement
show_chart
Coverage Timeline
newspaper
2 articles
Press Coverage
newspaper
2:26-cv-04248 Mark Ingraham v. 700 E Slauson ExtraSpace Storage
Deficiency in Filed Documents (G-112A) - optional html form ( 6
Apr 22, 2026
1 min read
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
9 hours, 35 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.