1:26-cv-03653 Hines v. Social Security Administration
Note Regarding Service on Self-Represented Party
The court issued a note regarding service on a self-represented party in the case of Hines v. Social Security Administration. This note is unrelated to the case of Mario Mendoza v. Lovely Party Supplies LLC et al. The note is a procedural step in the Hines case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:26-cv-03653 Hines v. Social Security Administration
Other · May 04, 2026
Coverage
3 articles
3 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff
6 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 04, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Lovely Party Supplies LLC, Social Security Administration, 2:26-cv-03653 Mario Mendoza and others.
Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 3 distinct sources.
Mario Mendoza v. Lovely Party Supplies LLC et al is an active civil matter in Southern District of New York under docket 26-cv-03653.
The dispute currently identifies 2:26-cv-03653 Mario Mendoza on one side and Lovely Party Supplies LLC and Social Security Administration on the other. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 4, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court issued a note regarding service on a self-represented party in the case of Hines v. Social Security Administration. This note is unrelated to the case of Mario Mendoza v. Lovely Party Supplies LLC et al. The note is a procedural step in the Hines. On April 28, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court has received a Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures from Ziobro et al in the case of 4:26-cv-03653.
This filing is a required disclosure of any potential conflicts of interest or affiliations. On April 23, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the case of Mario Mendoza v. This means that the sealed documents will not be publicly available.
The court's decision allows the parties to protect sensitive information.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
The court issued a note regarding service on a self-represented party in the case of Hines v. Social Security Administration. This note is unrelated to the case of Mario Mendoza v. Lovely Party Supplies LLC et al. The note is a procedural step in the Hines case.
The court has received a Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures from Ziobro et al in the case of 4:26-cv-03653. This filing is a required disclosure of any potential conflicts of interest or affiliations with other parties in the case. The filing is a routine step in the litigation process.
The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the case of Mario Mendoza v. Lovely Party Supplies LLC et al. This means that the sealed documents will not be publicly available. The court's decision allows the parties to protect sensitive information.
Note Regarding Service on Self-Represented Party
Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures ( 2
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
9 hours, 42 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.