2:24-cv-02050 Maneman et al v. Weyerhaeuser Company et al
Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel ( 92
Civil case in W.D. Wash. currently marked active. Latest development: 2:24-cv-02050 Maneman et al v. Weyerhaeuser Company et al. Coverage tracked from 1 media source.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
W.D. Wash.
Western District of Washington · 9th Circuit · WA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:24-cv-02050 Maneman et al v. Weyerhaeuser Company et al
Other · Apr 30, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Western District of Washington, a federal district court in WA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 30, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Weyerhaeuser Company and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Maneman et al v. Weyerhaeuser Company et al is an active civil matter in Western District of Washington under docket 24-cv-02050.
The main identified defendant or respondent is Weyerhaeuser Company. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, federal courts, court watch.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel was filed.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Western District of Washington (W.D. Wash.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, WA.
A Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel was filed.
Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel ( 92
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
2 hours, 11 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.