3:25-cv-07375 Committee for a Better Arvin, et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, et al
Approve Consent Judgment ( 29
Mahoney Environmental Solutions LLC et al v. Garces et al is a civil case with an affidavit in support. The affidavit in support is a legal document that provides evidence or testimony. The case was filed in the district court with docket number 25-cv-07375.
Latest development
Motion · April 21, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingCourt
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:25-cv-07375 Committee for a Better Arvin, et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, et al
Other · Apr 23, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 2 Plaintiffs, 1 Related Organization
5 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 23, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Mahoney Environmental Solutions LLC, Committee for a Better Arvin and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
Mahoney Environmental Solutions LLC et al v. Garces et al is an active civil matter in Northern District of California under docket 25-cv-07375.
The dispute currently identifies 1:25-cv-07375 Mahoney Environmental Solutions LLC and 3:25-cv-07375 Committee for a Better Arvin on one side and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on the other. The case is currently organized around affidavit in support, district court.
Garces et al is a civil case with an affidavit in support. The affidavit in support is a legal document that provides evidence or testimony. The case was filed in the district court with docket number 25-cv-07375.
On April 23, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court entered judgment. On April 21, 2026, the docket recorded a motion: A Motion was filed.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The court entered judgment.
A Motion was filed.
Approve Consent Judgment ( 29
Affidavit in Support (non-motion) ( 19
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
4 days, 14 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.