appeal

MACOMB FOOT, ANKLE & WOUND CARE et al v. BECERRA et al

24-cv-00869
Active Appeal in progress Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

This case involves a notice of appeal to the DC Circuit filed by Macomb Foot, Ankle & Wound Care et al against Becerra et al in the case 24-cv-00869. Further information is needed to provide a full summary.

Latest development

1:24-cv-00869 MACOMB FOOT, ANKLE & WOUND CARE et al v. BECERRA et al

Appeal · April 30, 2026

A Notice of Appeal was filed.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • notice of appeal
  • Macomb Foot, Ankle & Wound Care et al
  • Becerra et al
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Appellate

timeline

Stage

Appeal in progress

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:24-cv-00869 MACOMB FOOT, ANKLE & WOUND CARE et al v. BECERRA et al

Appeal · Apr 30, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Plaintiff

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a appeal dated April 30, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes 1:24-cv-00869 MACOMB FOOT, ANKLE & WOUND CARE and others.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
arrow_upward
Appeal April 30, 2026

1:24-cv-00869 MACOMB FOOT, ANKLE & WOUND CARE et al v. BECERRA et al

A Notice of Appeal was filed.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

12 hours, 17 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.