Case remanded to federal agency in Tir v. Bisignano in Massachusetts district court
Case Summary
Lyn Tir filed a lawsuit against Frank Bisignano in the District of Massachusetts, case number 25-cv-08790. The court has since remanded the case to a U.S. agency. The specific agency and the reasons for the remand are not provided.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Remand to Agency
- • District of Massachusetts
Docket Snapshot
Court
D. Mass.
District of Massachusetts · 1st Circuit · MA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:25-cv-11975 Robinson v. Frank Bisignano
Other · May 04, 2026
Coverage
9 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 7 Plaintiffs
10 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of Massachusetts, a federal district court in MA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 04, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Frank Bisignano, Nicole Allie Snow, David Ernest Herrera and others.
Press monitoring has found 9 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
The Story So Far
Lyn Tir v. Frank Bisignano is an active civil matter in District of Massachusetts under docket 25-cv-08790.
The dispute currently identifies 1:25-cv-11975 Robinson, 2:25-cv-07675 Kellee Marie Lengyel, and 2:25-cv-08542 Karina Gonzalez on one side and Frank Bisignano on the other. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, administrative law, federal courts, court watch.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 4, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court has denied a motion related to the case Robinson v. Frank Bisignano, which is a separate matter from Lyn Tir v. Frank Bisignano.
This decision does not directly impact the Lyn Tir case. The Robinson case is still ongoing. On April 28, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The case was remanded to a lower court.
On April 28, 2026, the docket recorded a other: Judge Jonathan Carrillo was granted an extension of time to file a document in the case of Lyn Tir v. This means that Carrillo now has more time to prepare and submit the document. The extension is likely to give Carrillo a chance to gather.
On April 28, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court awarded EAJA fees to Kellee Marie Lengyel in the amount of $19, in the case 2:25-cv-07675. This award is a result of a previous court decision. The award of EAJA fees is significant because it reimburses the plaintiff for costs associated with the.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
About This Court
District of Massachusetts (D. Mass.) is a federal district court in the 1st Circuit, MA.
Case Timeline
9 events1:25-cv-11975 Robinson v. Frank Bisignano
The court has denied a motion related to the case Robinson v. Frank Bisignano, which is a separate matter from Lyn Tir v. Frank Bisignano. This decision does not directly impact the Lyn Tir case. The Robinson case is still ongoing.
5:25-cv-02675 Nicole Allie Snow v. Frank Bisignano
The case was remanded to a lower court.
2:25-cv-12388 Jonathan Carrillo v. Frank Bisignano
Judge Jonathan Carrillo was granted an extension of time to file a document in the case of Lyn Tir v. Frank Bisignano. This means that Carrillo now has more time to prepare and submit the document. The extension is likely to give Carrillo a chance to gather necessary information or evidence.
2:25-cv-07675 Kellee Marie Lengyel v. Frank Bisignano
The court awarded EAJA fees to Kellee Marie Lengyel in the amount of $19, in the case 2:25-cv-07675. This award is a result of a previous court decision. The award of EAJA fees is significant because it reimburses the plaintiff for costs associated with the litigation.
2:25-cv-09511 Maricela Vargas v. Frank Bisignano
The court granted an extension of time for Frank Bisignano to file a document in the case Maricela Vargas v. Frank Bisignano (2:25-cv-09511). This means Bisignano now has more time to submit the required document. The extension is likely to give Bisignano more time to prepare the document.
2:25-cv-12241 Michael Constreras Perez v. Frank Bisignano
The court granted an extension of time for Frank Bisignano to file a document in the case Michael Constreras Perez v. Frank Bisignano (2:25-cv-12241). This means Bisignano now has more time to submit the required document. The extension is relevant to the ongoing case.
2:25-cv-08542 Karina Gonzalez v. Frank Bisignano
The court has been notified of a new case, Karina Gonzalez v. Frank Bisignano, with docket number 2:25-cv-08542. This notice indicates that a new lawsuit has been filed against Frank Bisignano. The case is now part of the court's active docket.
2:25-cv-12217 David Ernest Herrera v. Frank Bisignano
A response was filed.
2:25-cv-08790 Lyn Tir v. Frank Bisignano
The case was remanded to a lower court.
Coverage Timeline
Press Coverage
5:25-cv-02675 Nicole Allie Snow v. Frank Bisignano
Remand Case to US Agency ( 23
2:25-cv-12388 Jonathan Carrillo v. Frank Bisignano
Extension of Time to File Document ( 12
2:25-cv-07675 Kellee Marie Lengyel v. Frank Bisignano
Award of EAJA Fees ( 19
2:25-cv-09511 Maricela Vargas v. Frank Bisignano
Extension of Time to File Document ( 17
2:25-cv-12241 Michael Constreras Perez v. Frank Bisignano
Extension of Time to File Document ( 11
2:25-cv-08542 Karina Gonzalez v. Frank Bisignano
Notice (Other) ( 22
2:25-cv-12217 David Ernest Herrera v. Frank Bisignano
Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ( 11
2:25-cv-08790 Lyn Tir v. Frank Bisignano
Remand Case to US Agency ( 20
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 9 articles
Timeline events
9 records on file
Last updated
5 days ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.