Lozano Maldonado proceeds in forma pauperis against SSA Commissioner in NDCA
Case Summary
Lozano Maldonado v. SSA Commissioner in the Northern District of California proceeds with an in forma pauperis status. This allows the plaintiff to continue without paying court fees due to financial hardship.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Social Security benefits
- • In forma pauperis
- • Access to justice
Docket Snapshot
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
4:26-cv-04401 Lozano Maldonado v. SSA Commissioner
Other · May 13, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 13, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes SSA Commissioner, Lozano Maldonado.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
1 event4:26-cv-04401 Lozano Maldonado v. SSA Commissioner
The court granted Lozano Maldonado permission to proceed in forma pauperis, allowing the case to continue without paying filing fees due to the plaintiff's financial status. This means the plaintiff can pursue the lawsuit against the Social Security Administration Commissioner despite lacking funds. The court's decision removes a financial barrier to access the legal system.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
48 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.