0:26-cv-60223 Louis Vuitton Malletier v. calan_style88
Summons (Affidavit) Returned Executed ( 9
Louis Vuitton Malletier sued calan_style88 in the Southern District of Florida, docket 26-cv-60223. A summons was returned executed, indicating the defendant has been formally served.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
S.D. Fla.
Southern District of Florida · 11th Circuit · FL
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
0:26-cv-60223 Louis Vuitton Malletier v. calan_style88
Other · Apr 24, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Southern District of Florida, a federal district court in FL.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 24, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes calan_style88, 0:26-cv-60223 Louis Vuitton Malletier.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Louis Vuitton Malletier v. calan_style88 is an active civil matter in Southern District of Florida under docket 26-cv-60223.
The dispute currently identifies 0:26-cv-60223 Louis Vuitton Malletier on one side and calan_style88 on the other. The case is currently organized around unknown court.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 24, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Summons was issued.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla.) is a federal district court in the 11th Circuit, FL.
A Summons was issued.
Summons (Affidavit) Returned Executed ( 9
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
4 hours, 35 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.