Scheduling notice issued in Los Angeles County MTA v. California Drop Forge in California
Case Summary
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority and others sued California Drop Forge, Inc. and others in the Central District of California, docket 23-cv-01728. The court issued a scheduling notice, setting deadlines for case progression.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Contract enforcement
- • Commercial litigation
Docket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:23-cv-01728 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. California Drop Forge, Inc. et al
Other · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes California Drop Forge, Inc, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
1 event2:23-cv-01728 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. California Drop Forge, Inc. et al
The court issued a text-only scheduling notice in the case Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. California Drop Forge, Inc. This notice sets key dates and deadlines for the parties involved. It helps organize the timeline for motions, discovery, and trial preparation.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
46 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.