1:25-cv-06751 Lopez v. Socksmith Design, Inc.
in Opposition to Motion ( 17 )
Civil case in S.D.N.Y. currently marked active. Latest development: 1:25-cv-06751 Lopez v. Socksmith Design, Inc.. Coverage tracked from 1 media source.
Latest development
Motion · May 1, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingCourt
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Motion practice
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:25-cv-06751 Lopez v. Socksmith Design, Inc.
Motion · May 01, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a motion dated May 01, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Socksmith Design, Inc and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Lopez v. Socksmith Design, Inc. is an active civil matter in Southern District of New York under docket 25-cv-06751.
The main identified defendant or respondent is Socksmith Design, Inc. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 1, 2026, the docket recorded a motion: A Motion was filed.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest motion produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
A Motion was filed.
in Opposition to Motion ( 17 )
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
13 hours, 26 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.