Long Point Energy LLC voluntarily dismisses case against Leticia Warren in California
Case Summary
Long Point Energy LLC voluntarily dismissed its case against Leticia Warren in the Central District of California, docket 25-cv-09788. The dismissal was filed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), ending the lawsuit without prejudice.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Voluntary dismissal
- • Long Point Energy LLC
- • Leticia Warren
- • Central District of California
Docket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:25-cv-09788 Long Point Energy LLC v. Leticia Warren et al
Other · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff, 1 Related Organization
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Leticia Warren, Long Point Energy LLC and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
1 event2:25-cv-09788 Long Point Energy LLC v. Leticia Warren et al
Long Point Energy LLC voluntarily dismissed its lawsuit against Leticia Warren and others under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). This means the plaintiff chose to end the case without a court order before the defendants filed an answer or motion for summary judgment. The dismissal closes the case without a judgment on the merits.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
14 hours, 14 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.