Lexis-Olivier Ray v. City of Los Angeles et al
Case Summary
The court docketed a new case titled Calvin Lorenzo Morris v. City of Los Angeles, assigned number 2:22-cv-09277. This indicates the filing of a separate lawsuit involving the City of Los Angeles, distinct from the Lexis-Olivier Ray case. Tracking this case is important because it may involve related parties or issues affecting ongoing litigation against the city.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Docket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:23-cv-09444 B.S.K. v. County of Los Angeles et al
Other · May 13, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 2 Plaintiffs
5 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 13, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, 2:25-cv-08938 Lexis-Olivier Ray and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
3 events2:23-cv-09444 B.S.K. v. County of Los Angeles et al
The parties filed a joint status report.
2:22-cv-09277 Calvin Lorenzo Morris v. City of Los Angeles et al
The court docketed a new case titled Calvin Lorenzo Morris v. City of Los Angeles, assigned number 2:22-cv-09277. This indicates the filing of a separate lawsuit involving the City of Los Angeles, distinct from the Lexis-Olivier Ray case. Tracking this case is important because it may involve related parties or issues affecting ongoing litigation against the city.
2:25-cv-08938 Lexis-Olivier Ray v. City of Los Angeles et al
The parties filed a joint stipulation.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
1 hour, 3 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.