civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

Lettieri v. T-Mobile et al

24-cv-00028 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

A new case, Esperanza Reyes Rendon v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al, was filed in the same court as Lettieri v. T-Mobile et al, with docket number 2:24-cv-01666. This case is likely related to the same parties and issues as Lettieri v. T-Mobile et al. The filing of this new case may impact the progress of the Lettieri case.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture
  • Current docket activity and next procedural step
  • Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:24-cv-01666 Esperanza Reyes Rendon v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al

Other · May 05, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 2 Plaintiffs

4 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes T-Mobile USA, Inc, 2:24-cv-00028 Lettieri, 2:24-cv-01666 Esperanza Reyes Rendon and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 11 hours, 6 minutes ago

Lettieri v. T-Mobile et al is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 24-cv-00028.

The dispute currently identifies 2:24-cv-00028 Lettieri and 2:24-cv-01666 Esperanza Reyes Rendon on one side and T-Mobile USA, Inc on the other. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A new case, Esperanza Reyes Rendon v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al, was filed in the same court as Lettieri v. T-Mobile et al, with docket number 2:24-cv-01666. This case is likely related to the same parties and issues as Lettieri v. T-Mobile et al.

The filing. On May 4, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted a motion to seal documents in the Lettieri v. T-Mobile et al case.

This means that certain information will be kept private. The court's decision allows the parties to protect sensitive information.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other May 5, 2026

2:24-cv-01666 Esperanza Reyes Rendon v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al

A new case, Esperanza Reyes Rendon v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al, was filed in the same court as Lettieri v. T-Mobile et al, with docket number 2:24-cv-01666. This case is likely related to the same parties and issues as Lettieri v. T-Mobile et al. The filing of this new case may impact the progress of the Lettieri case.

info
Other May 4, 2026

2:24-cv-00028 Lettieri v. T-Mobile et al

The court granted a motion to seal documents in the Lettieri v. T-Mobile et al case. This means that certain information will be kept private. The court's decision allows the parties to protect sensitive information.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

11 hours, 6 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.