federal-courts investigation

LEOPOLD v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al

22-cv-01921
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Leopold is suing the Federal Bureau of Investigation and unnamed co-defendants in a case docketed as 22-cv-01921. The matter is active enough to require a status conference, suggesting the court is managing ongoing disputes or scheduling. Given the FBI as a named defendant and the 2022 filing date, this is likely a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) action or a related records-access dispute. Status conferences in FOIA cases typically address production schedules or search adequacy.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Government records access or FOIA compliance
  • Adequacy of FBI search and production
  • Case scheduling and court oversight of federal agency defendant
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other April 20, 2026

2:25-cv-12079 Ali Raisdanai v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al

The court granted an extension of time to file a document in Leopold v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al, a Freedom of Information Act case pending in federal court under docket 2:25-cv-12079. Deadlines slipped — someone needed more time, and the court gave it. No merits ruling, no dismissal, just a calendar adjustment.

info
Other April 20, 2026

1:22-cv-01921 LEOPOLD v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al

A status conference was held in Leopold v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al, Case No. 1:22-cv-01921. These check-in hearings let the judge take stock of where discovery or negotiations stand and push the parties toward resolution or trial.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

2 hours, 13 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.