civil-litigation federal-courts

Western District of Washington Issues Scheduling Order in Leomiti v. Betelligungs

24-cv-01583 W.D. Wash.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Leomiti et al v. Betelligungs et al is a civil case in the Western District of Washington involving a scheduling order. The court set or reset deadlines for case management, affecting discovery and motion practice timelines. These deadlines guide the litigation pace.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Deadline management
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

W.D. Wash.

Western District of Washington · 9th Circuit · WA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:24-cv-01583 Leomiti et al v. Betelligungs et al

Other · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Western District of Washington, a federal district court in WA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Betelligungs and others.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

About This Court

Western District of Washington (W.D. Wash.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, WA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other May 11, 2026

2:24-cv-01583 Leomiti et al v. Betelligungs et al

The court adjusted the deadlines in the case Leomiti et al v. Betelligungs et al, docket number 2:24-cv-01583. This change affects the schedule for filings or other procedural steps. Parties must now comply with the new timeline set by the court.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

3 hours, 41 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.