civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

Leatherman v. AT&T Inc. et al

26-cv-80472 E.D. Tex.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Leatherman, has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The case is currently ongoing in the district court. The motion is likely in response to financial difficulties or other circumstances that prevent the plaintiff from paying the filing fee.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture
  • Current docket activity and next procedural step
  • Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement
  • Claims pleaded in the complaint and early case posture
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

E.D. Tex.

Eastern District of Texas · 5th Circuit · TX

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:23-cv-00486 ASUS Technology Licensing Inc. et al v. AT&T Inc. et al

Other · Apr 24, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

2 Plaintiffs, 1 Related Organization

4 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Eastern District of Texas, a federal district court in TX.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 24, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes 9:26-cv-80472 Leatherman, 2:23-cv-00486 ASUS Technology Licensing Inc and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 10 hours, 39 minutes ago

Leatherman v. AT&T Inc. et al is an active civil matter in Eastern District of Texas under docket 26-cv-80472.

The main identified plaintiff or petitioner is 2:23-cv-00486 ASUS Technology Licensing Inc and 9:26-cv-80472 Leatherman. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement, Claims pleaded in the complaint and early case posture.

The plaintiff, Leatherman, has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The case is currently ongoing in the district court. The motion is likely in response to financial difficulties or other circumstances that prevent the plaintiff from paying the filing fee.

On April 24, 2026, the docket recorded a other: AT&T Inc. was named as a defendant in a separate lawsuit, ASUS Technology Licensing Inc. v. AT&T Inc., case number 2:23-cv-00486. This lawsuit is unrelated to the Leatherman v. case.

The details of the ASUS lawsuit are not specified. On April 24, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted Leatherman's request to proceed in forma pauperis, allowing him to continue his lawsuit against AT&T Inc. without paying the required filing fee.

This decision is significant because it enables Leatherman to pursue his case despite financial.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Eastern District of Texas (E.D. Tex.) is a federal district court in the 5th Circuit, TX.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other April 24, 2026

2:23-cv-00486 ASUS Technology Licensing Inc. et al v. AT&T Inc. et al

AT&T Inc. was named as a defendant in a separate lawsuit, ASUS Technology Licensing Inc. v. AT&T Inc., case number 2:23-cv-00486. This lawsuit is unrelated to the Leatherman v. case. The details of the ASUS lawsuit are not specified.

info
Other April 24, 2026

9:26-cv-80472 Leatherman v. AT&T Inc. et al

The court granted Leatherman's request to proceed in forma pauperis, allowing him to continue his lawsuit against AT&T Inc. without paying the required filing fee. This decision is significant because it enables Leatherman to pursue his case despite financial constraints. The court's ruling will allow the lawsuit to move forward.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

10 hours, 39 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.