2:26-cv-02710 Lamar Myers v. Aracely Urbina et al
Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) ( 13
Lamar Myers v. Aracely Urbina et al is a civil case with an unknown court. The case was filed under docket number 26-cv-02710. An extending time to answer is a standard document filed by a party to request additional time to respond to a complaint. This document is typically used to request a short extension of time to respond to a complaint, and it does not indicate any significant developments in the case. The case is currently in a pre-trial stage.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:26-cv-02710 Lamar Myers v. Aracely Urbina et al
Other · Apr 21, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 21, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Aracely Urbina, 2:26-cv-02710 Lamar Myers.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Lamar Myers v. Aracely Urbina et al is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 26-cv-02710.
The dispute currently identifies 2:26-cv-02710 Lamar Myers on one side and Aracely Urbina on the other. The case is currently organized around Extending time to answer, Request additional time, Pre-trial stage.
Aracely Urbina et al is a civil case with an unknown court. The case was filed under docket number 26-cv-02710. An extending time to answer is a standard document filed by a party to request additional time to respond to a complaint.
This document is typically used to request a short extension of time to respond to a complaint, and it does not indicate any significant developments in the case. The case is currently in a pre-trial stage.
On April 21, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted defendant Aracely Urbina's request to extend her time to answer the complaint in Lamar Myers v. Aracely Urbina et al, giving her 30 days or less to respond. This means the deadline for her response has been pushed back.
The extension is.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The court granted defendant Aracely Urbina's request to extend her time to answer the complaint in Lamar Myers v. Aracely Urbina et al, giving her 30 days or less to respond. This means the deadline for her response has been pushed back. The extension is likely to give Urbina more time to gather evidence or consult with her attorney.
Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) ( 13
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
16 hours, 26 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.