legal-news

LaDove, Inc. v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company

25-cv-06824
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

A lawyer from My Investments LLC has been allowed to appear in a court case in New York, despite not being a member of the state's bar. This is because the lawyer has been granted permission to appear pro hac vice, which allows them to represent their client in this specific case. This decision is significant because it allows the lawyer to participate in the case, but it does not grant them full membership in the state's bar.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other April 30, 2026

1:23-cv-04229 My Investments LLC v. Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company

A lawyer from My Investments LLC has been allowed to appear in a court case in New York, despite not being a member of the state's bar. This is because the lawyer has been granted permission to appear pro hac vice, which allows them to represent their client in this specific case. This decision is significant because it allows the lawyer to participate in the case, but it does not grant them full membership in the state's bar.

info
Other April 29, 2026

1:25-cv-06824 LaDove, Inc. v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company

The court granted LaDove, Inc.'s motion to compel Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company to produce certain documents. This decision allows LaDove to access the requested information, which is key to their case. The court's ruling is significant because it demonstrates the importance of transparency in the discovery process.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

3 days, 13 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.