1:26-cv-02528 Caturan v. Bank of America
Extension of Time to File Answer ( 9
The Bank of America, N.A. has been granted an extension of time to file an answer in the case of Caturan v. Bank of America, which is a separate case from Krogh v. Bank of America. This means the bank now has more time to respond to the plaintiff's allegations. The extension is significant because it gives the bank more time to prepare its defense.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
The Bank of America, N.A. has been granted an extension of time to file an answer in the case of Caturan v. Bank of America, which is a separate case from Krogh v. Bank of America. This means the bank now has more time to respond to the plaintiff's allegations. The extension is significant because it gives the bank more time to prepare its defense.
The parties in Gomes v. Costco Wholesale Corporation have agreed to waive their right to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge. This decision allows the case to proceed in the district court. The consent form was filed on an unrelated case, Krogh v. Bank of America, N.A., but is related to the Gomes case.
The court set or revised the case schedule.
Bank of America, N.A. has been granted an extension of time to file its answer in the Krogh v. case. This means the bank now has more time to respond to the plaintiff's claims. The extension is likely to give the bank time to review the case and prepare its defense.
Extension of Time to File Answer ( 9
Consent/Declination to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge ( 4
Joint Case Management Statement ( 17
Extension of Time to File Answer ( 11
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 4 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
14 hours, 55 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.