1:22-cv-00195 KOURANI v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF US ATTORNEY et al
Status Report ( 43
Civil case in D.D.C. currently marked active. Latest development: 1:22-cv-00195 KOURANI v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF US ATTORNEY et al. Coverage tracked from 1 media source.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
D.D.C.
District of Columbia · D.C. Circuit · DC
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:22-cv-00195 KOURANI v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF US ATTORNEY et al
Other · May 01, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to District of Columbia, a federal district court in DC.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 01, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF US ATTORNEY and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
KOURANI v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF US ATTORNEY et al: Status Report is an active civil matter in District of Columbia under docket 22-cv-00195.
The main identified defendant or respondent is EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF US ATTORNEY. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, federal courts.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 1, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The parties filed a joint status report.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
District of Columbia (D.D.C.) is a federal district court in the D.C. Circuit, DC.
The parties filed a joint status report.
Status Report ( 43
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day, 14 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.