newspaper
1:26-cv-22691 Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. The Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations identified on Schedule A
Apr 19, 2026
1 min read
legal-news
Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. The Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations identified on Schedule A
26-cv-22691
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. The Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, docket 26-cv-22691, follows the standard structure of a brand-protection or intellectual property enforcement action against anonymous online sellers. Philips, the Dutch multinational electronics company, is the plaintiff. The defendants are unnamed Schedule A parties, a filing convention used in federal court to pursue counterfeit goods sellers or trademark infringers operating across multiple e-commerce storefronts. No court, substantive filings, or claim details are confirmed in the source data. The case is newly filed and the record is empty beyond the docket number and case title.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Trademark or intellectual property infringement by anonymous online sellers
- • Identity and service of Schedule A defendants
- • Potential temporary restraining order or asset freeze against defendants
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
2 events
info
Other
April 19, 2026
1:26-cv-22691 Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. The Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations identified on Schedule A
Koninklijke Philips N.V. filed suit in what appears to be a Schedule A case — a mass-defendant IP enforcement action targeting anonymous online sellers grouped under a placeholder defendant class. These cases typically involve counterfeit goods sold through e-commerce platforms, with the real defendants identified only in a sealed schedule filed with the court. The docket number 1:26-cv-22691 places this in federal court, though the district is not specified in the filing details provided.
info
Other
April 19, 2026
1:25-cv-14595 Cai v. The Corporations, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
A miscellaneous relief filing landed in what appears to be a related or consolidated Schedule A defendants case — the kind of catch-all docket entry that often signals a TRO, asset freeze, or ex parte motion the court hasn't yet fully docketed. The Philips case targets anonymous online sellers grouped under a Schedule A, a common structure in IP enforcement actions where plaintiffs sue dozens of e-commerce defendants at once. The sparse description makes the specific relief sought unclear, but miscellaneous relief in this posture typically means something urgent.
Advertisement
newspaper
2 articles
Press Coverage
newspaper
1:25-cv-14595 Cai v. The Corporations, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Miscellaneous Relief ( 22
Apr 19, 2026
1 min read
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 hour, 13 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.