civil-litigation federal-courts

Central District of California files memorandum supporting motion in Kohen Diallo Uhuru v. Bonnifield

19-cv-10449 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The Central District of California filed a memorandum supporting a motion in Kohen Diallo Uhuru v. Bonnifield. The memorandum presents legal arguments and authorities backing the party's request to the court.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Memorandum of law
  • Motion support
  • Legal arguments
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:19-cv-10449 Kohen Diallo Uhuru v. Jim Bonnifield et al

Other · May 12, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Jim Bonnifield, Kohen Diallo Uhuru.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other May 12, 2026

2:19-cv-10449 Kohen Diallo Uhuru v. Jim Bonnifield et al

Plaintiff Kohen Diallo Uhuru filed a memorandum of points and authorities in support of a motion in the case against Jim Bonnifield and others. This document outlines the legal arguments and evidence backing the plaintiff's position. It matters because it frames the plaintiff's legal basis and can influence the court's ruling on the related motion.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

17 hours, 12 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.