Central District of California files memorandum supporting motion in Kohen Diallo Uhuru v. Bonnifield
Case Summary
The Central District of California filed a memorandum supporting a motion in Kohen Diallo Uhuru v. Bonnifield. The memorandum presents legal arguments and authorities backing the party's request to the court.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Memorandum of law
- • Motion support
- • Legal arguments
Docket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:19-cv-10449 Kohen Diallo Uhuru v. Jim Bonnifield et al
Other · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Jim Bonnifield, Kohen Diallo Uhuru.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
1 event2:19-cv-10449 Kohen Diallo Uhuru v. Jim Bonnifield et al
Plaintiff Kohen Diallo Uhuru filed a memorandum of points and authorities in support of a motion in the case against Jim Bonnifield and others. This document outlines the legal arguments and evidence backing the plaintiff's position. It matters because it frames the plaintiff's legal basis and can influence the court's ruling on the related motion.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
17 hours, 12 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.