KLYUKIN v. BLINKEN et al
Case Summary
The court has ruled in favor of Battersby in the case 3:20-cv-06561, which is a separate lawsuit from KLYUKIN v. BLINKEN et al. This decision does not directly impact the KLYUKIN case. The court's ruling in Battersby v. Lien et al is significant because it sets a precedent for future cases.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Docket Snapshot
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:20-cv-06561 Battersby v. Lien et al
Other · May 05, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
1 Plaintiff
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes 3:20-cv-06561 Battersby and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
About This Court
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
2 events3:20-cv-06561 Battersby v. Lien et al
The court has ruled in favor of Battersby in the case 3:20-cv-06561, which is a separate lawsuit from KLYUKIN v. BLINKEN et al. This decision does not directly impact the KLYUKIN case. The court's ruling in Battersby v. Lien et al is significant because it sets a precedent for future cases.
1:24-cv-03258 KLYUKIN v. BLINKEN et al
The parties filed a joint status report.
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
22 hours, 22 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.