Kim et al v. The Democratic People's Republic of Korea
Case Summary
Kim et al v. The Democratic People's Republic of Korea is a civil case with a current docket number of 25-mc-00527. The case details are not available.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture
- • Current docket activity and next procedural step
- • Government parties, public agencies, or official-capacity claims
- • Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement
- • Claims pleaded in the complaint and early case posture
Docket Snapshot
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:25-mc-00527 Kim et al v. The Democratic People's Republic of Korea
Other · Apr 28, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 28, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Democratic People's Republic of Korea and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
About This Court
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
Case Timeline
1 event1:25-mc-00527 Kim et al v. The Democratic People's Republic of Korea
The court granted a motion to seal a document in the case of Kim et al v. The Democratic People's Republic of Korea, citing national security concerns. The sealed document is related to a lawsuit against the North Korean government. This decision allows the parties to protect sensitive information.
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
54 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.