newspaper
legal-news
KENTTA v. TRIPLE CANOPY, INC. et al
19-cv-00090
D.D.C.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The court granted a motion to seal documents in the case of KENTTA v. TRIPLE CANOPY, INC. et al, citing the need to protect confidential business information. The sealed documents are related to a dispute over a security contract. This ruling allows the parties to keep sensitive information private.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
D.D.C.
District of Columbia · D.C. Circuit · DC
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
1:19-cv-00090 KENTTA v. TRIPLE CANOPY, INC. et al
Other · May 07, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
groups
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of Columbia, a federal district court in DC.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 07, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes TRIPLE CANOPY, INC and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
About This Court
District of Columbia (D.D.C.) is a federal district court in the D.C. Circuit, DC.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
1 event
info
Other
May 7, 2026
1:19-cv-00090 KENTTA v. TRIPLE CANOPY, INC. et al
The court granted a motion to seal documents in the case of KENTTA v. TRIPLE CANOPY, INC. et al, citing the need to protect confidential business information. The sealed documents are related to a dispute over a security contract. This ruling allows the parties to keep sensitive information private.
Advertisement
newspaper
1 article
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
2 hours, 20 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.