1:18-cv-04994 Love v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago
Extension of Time ( 316
Karen D. et al v. Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago et al is a pending case in the 24-cv-12282 court. The case involves a motion to withdraw as attorney, but the current summary is incomplete and no further information is available at this time. The case type is not specified, but it appears to be a civil matter. The case is likely a civil case involving a dispute between the plaintiff and the defendant, a school board. The plaintiff is seeking relief, but the nature of the relief is not specified.
Latest development
Order · April 22, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingCourt
N.D. Ill.
Northern District of Illinois · 7th Circuit · IL
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:18-cv-04994 Love v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago
Other · Apr 23, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
1 source tracked
Participants
2 Defendants
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Northern District of Illinois, a federal district court in IL.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 23, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago, Board of Education of the City of Chicago and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 1 distinct source.
Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.) is a federal district court in the 7th Circuit, IL.
The court granted an extension of time for the case 'Love v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago' (1:18-cv-04994), allowing the parties more time to proceed. This extension is significant because it gives the parties additional time to prepare and respond to the case. The extension is for 316 days.
A Motion was filed.
Extension of Time ( 316
Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney ( 114
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 20 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.