Miquel Beasley, 23, of Maryland, was convicted yesterday in the Superior Court for the District of Columbia, for an armed carjacking and armed robbery that took place in March 2024. The conviction is a significant development in the ongoing effort to combat violent crime and protect the public. The case highlights the importance of law enforcement's efforts to investigate and prosecute individuals who engage in violent behavior.
Latest development
Media Coverage · April 30, 2026
A Maryland man, Miquel Beasley, was found guilty of armed carjacking and armed robbery of an Army veteran in a Superior Court for the District of Columbia. The crime occurred in March 2024. Beasley, 23, was convicted after a trial.
newspaper Read articleCourt
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Criminal
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
Jury Finds Maryland Man Guilty of Armed Carjacking and Armed Robbery of Army Veteran
Media Coverage · Apr 30, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a media coverage dated April 30, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
A Maryland man, Miquel Beasley, was found guilty of armed carjacking and armed robbery of an Army veteran in a Superior Court for the District of Columbia. The crime occurred in March 2024. Beasley, 23, was convicted after a trial.
Miquel Beasley, 23, of Maryland, was convicted yesterday in the Superior Court for the District of Columbia, for an armed carjacking and armed robbery that took place in March 2024, …
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
13 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.