civil-litigation healthcare insurance federal-courts court-watch

Johnston et al v. Advocate Sherman Hospital et al

23-cv-01275 D. Colo.
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Johnston et al v. Advocate Sherman Hospital et al is a civil case. The case involves an order authorizing an interpleader deposit under 28 U.S.C. Section 1335. The court has issued an order allowing the deposit, which is a significant development in the case.

Latest development

1:24-cv-02088 Midland National Life Insurance Company v. Johnson et al

Order · April 23, 2026

The court issued an order.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Interpleader deposit
  • 28 U.S.C. Section 1335
  • Order authorizing deposit
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D. Colo.

District of Colorado · 10th Circuit · CO

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:24-cv-02088 Midland National Life Insurance Company v. Johnson et al

Order · Apr 24, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 2 Plaintiffs, 1 Related Organization

5 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of Colorado, a federal district court in CO.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated April 24, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Advocate Sherman Hospital, 1:23-cv-01275 Johnston, 1:24-cv-02088 Midland National Life Insurance Company and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 2 weeks ago

Johnston et al v. Advocate Sherman Hospital et al is a civil case currently active in the federal court system. The case involves an order authorizing an interpleader deposit under 28 U.S.C.

Section 1335, which allows a court to grant a deposit of funds in a dispute over property or assets. On April 24, 2026, the court issued an order allowing the deposit, marking a significant development in the case.

The order was preceded by a motion to seal certain documents in the case, which was granted by the court on April 23, 2026, citing the need to protect confidential information. The court has not yet assigned a judge to the case, and the docket number is 23-cv-01275. The case is currently in the active stage, with the next steps to be determined by the court.

The interpleader deposit is a key issue in the case, and the court's order authorizing it is a key development that will likely shape the course of the litigation. The court's decision to seal certain documents in the case suggests that there may be sensitive or confidential information at play, which could impact the case's progress and outcome.

As the case moves forward, it will be important to monitor the court's decisions and actions, particularly with regard to the interpleader deposit and the sealed documents. The court's next move will be to determine the scope and terms of the interpleader deposit, which could involve further hearings or proceedings.

The parties involved in the case will also need to respond to the court's order and take any necessary steps to comply with its terms. The case is currently in a critical phase, and the next few weeks will be key in determining its outcome.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

District of Colorado (D. Colo.) is a federal district court in the 10th Circuit, CO.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
gavel
Order April 23, 2026

1:24-cv-02088 Midland National Life Insurance Company v. Johnson et al

The court issued an order.

info
Other April 23, 2026

1:23-cv-01275 Johnston et al v. Advocate Sherman Hospital et al

The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the Johnston et al v. Advocate Sherman Hospital et al case, citing the need to protect confidential information. This decision allows the parties to keep sensitive information private, but may limit public access to the case. The sealed documents are likely related to patient information or business strategies.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

55 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.