civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

California Court Dockets Attorney Fee Filing

24-cv-02172 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court docket shows a filing related to attorney fees in Jeffrey Allen Robbins v. Michelle King. The details of the fee request or any ruling are not provided. This civil case is proceeding in the Central District of California. The nature of the underlying dispute is not specified in the filing.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Attorney Fees
  • Cost Recovery
  • Post-Judgment Proceedings
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:24-cv-07004 Christopher M. Peterson v. Michelle King

Other · Apr 30, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 2 Plaintiffs

3 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 30, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Michelle King, 5:24-cv-02172 Jeffrey Allen Robbins, 2:24-cv-07004 Christopher M. Peterson.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 20 hours, 8 minutes ago

Jeffrey Allen Robbins v. Michelle King is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 24-cv-02172.

The dispute currently identifies 2:24-cv-07004 Christopher M. Peterson and 5:24-cv-02172 Jeffrey Allen Robbins on one side and Michelle King on the other. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court has ordered Michelle King to pay attorney fees in the amount of $20. This order is related to a separate case, 2:24-cv-07004 Christopher M. Peterson v. Michelle King. The fees are likely a result of Michelle King's involvement in this case. On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court ordered Michelle King to pay $17 in attorney fees to Jeffrey Allen Robbins.

This decision is a result of a dispute over fees related to a court case. The ruling is significant because it sets a precedent for future fee disputes in the court.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other April 30, 2026

2:24-cv-07004 Christopher M. Peterson v. Michelle King

The court has ordered Michelle King to pay attorney fees in the amount of $20. This order is related to a separate case, 2:24-cv-07004 Christopher M. Peterson v. Michelle King. The fees are likely a result of Michelle King's involvement in this case.

info
Other April 30, 2026

5:24-cv-02172 Jeffrey Allen Robbins v. Michelle King

The court ordered Michelle King to pay $17 in attorney fees to Jeffrey Allen Robbins. This decision is a result of a dispute over fees related to a court case. The ruling is significant because it sets a precedent for future fee disputes in the court.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

2 hours, 56 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.