civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

Summons served in Jardine Gougis v. Sergios Tacos, Inc. in Northern District of California

26-cv-02324 N.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Jardine Gougis v. Sergios Tacos, Inc. et al is a civil case with a current summary of Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days). The court has not been specified. The docket number is 26-cv-02324. This is a routine update indicating that the summons and complaint have been served on the defendants.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Service of Summons and Complaint
  • Returned Executed
  • 21 days
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

N.D. Cal.

Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

5:26-cv-02324 Curtis-Shanley v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

Other · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

3 Defendants, 2 Plaintiffs

5 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Sergios Tacos, Inc, Meta Platforms Inc, County of San Bernardino and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 4 days, 19 hours ago

Jardine Gougis v. Sergios Tacos, Inc. et al is an active civil matter in Northern District of California under docket 26-cv-02324.

The dispute currently identifies 2:26-cv-02324 Jardine Gougis and 4:26-cv-02324 Ann Arbor Public Schools, Michigan on one side and Meta Platforms, Inc and Sergios Tacos, Inc on the other. The case is currently organized around Service of Summons and Complaint, Returned Executed.

et al is a civil case with a current summary of Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days). The court has not been specified. The docket number is 26-cv-02324.

This is a routine update indicating that the summons and complaint have been served on the defendants.

On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Summons was issued. On April 25, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Summons was issued.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
info
Other May 11, 2026

5:26-cv-02324 Curtis-Shanley v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

The court flagged a deficiency in the attorney's case opening in the matter of Curtis-Shanley v. County of San Bernardino, filed under case number 5:26-cv-02324 in the Northern District of California. This means the initial filing did not meet procedural requirements and may delay the case unless corrected. The issue arose during the summons service phase in Jardine Gougis v. Sergios Tacos, Inc., indicating potential procedural overlap or administrative error.

info
Other May 5, 2026

4:26-cv-02324 Ann Arbor Public Schools, Michigan v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al

A Summons was issued.

info
Other April 24, 2026

2:26-cv-02324 Jardine Gougis v. Sergios Tacos, Inc. et al

A Summons was issued.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

2 days, 12 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.