legal-news

Jane Doe v. MCG Canton Arboretum LLC, et al

25-cv-12292 D. Mass.
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Jane Doe v. MCG Canton Arboretum LLC, et al is a case currently pending in an unknown court. The case was assigned docket number 25-cv-12292. The current status of the case is an order dismissing the case.

Latest development

1:25-cv-12292 Jane Doe v. MCG Canton Arboretum LLC, et al

Order · April 28, 2026

The court issued an order.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Order Dismissing Case
  • Unknown Court
  • Docket Number
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D. Mass.

District of Massachusetts · 1st Circuit · MA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:25-cv-12292 Jane Doe v. MCG Canton Arboretum LLC, et al

Order · Apr 28, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of Massachusetts, a federal district court in MA.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated April 28, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes MCG Canton Arboretum LLC and others.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

About This Court

District of Massachusetts (D. Mass.) is a federal district court in the 1st Circuit, MA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order April 28, 2026

1:25-cv-12292 Jane Doe v. MCG Canton Arboretum LLC, et al

The court issued an order.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 day, 3 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.