appeals appeal federal-courts court-watch

Jaime Valencia Sues Clayton Homes, Inc.

25-cv-01459 D.N.J.
Active Appeal in progress Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

An appeal has been filed in the case of Jaime Valencia against Clayton Homes, Inc. The appeal moves the case from the District of New Jersey to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. This action indicates a party is dissatisfied with a lower court decision.

Latest development

1:25-cv-01459 CHRISTIAN CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES v. THE TOWNSHIP OF GLOUCESTER

Appeal · April 30, 2026

A Notice of Appeal was filed.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • • Notice of Appeal
  • • Appellate review
  • • Civil dispute
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D.N.J.

District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ

tag

Docket

Not captured

Appellate

timeline

Stage

Appeal in progress

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:25-cv-01459 CHRISTIAN CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES v. THE TOWNSHIP OF GLOUCESTER

Appeal · Apr 30, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

2 Defendants, 2 Plaintiffs

4 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.

The newest docket activity we have is a appeal dated April 30, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Clayton Homes, Inc, TOWNSHIP OF GLOUCESTER, 5:25-cv-01459 Jaime Valencia and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 4 days, 7 hours ago

Jaime Valencia Sues Clayton Homes, Inc. is an active appellate matter in District of New Jersey under docket 25-cv-01459.

The dispute currently identifies 1:25-cv-01459 CHRISTIAN CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES and 5:25-cv-01459 Jaime Valencia on one side and Clayton Homes, Inc and TOWNSHIP OF GLOUCESTER on the other. The case is currently organized around Jaime Valencia vs. Clayton Homes.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a appeal: A Notice of Appeal was filed. On April 25, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court dismissed the case of Jaime Valencia v. Clayton Homes, Inc.

et al. This dismissal means that the lawsuit filed by Jaime Valencia against Clayton Homes, Inc. and other defendants will no longer proceed.

The case was dismissed with a docket number of.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest appeal produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
arrow_upward
Appeal April 30, 2026

1:25-cv-01459 CHRISTIAN CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES v. THE TOWNSHIP OF GLOUCESTER

A Notice of Appeal was filed.

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other April 24, 2026

5:25-cv-01459 Jaime Valencia v. Clayton Homes, Inc. et al

The court dismissed the case of Jaime Valencia v. Clayton Homes, Inc. et al. This dismissal means that the lawsuit filed by Jaime Valencia against Clayton Homes, Inc. and other defendants will no longer proceed. The case was dismissed with a docket number of 5:25-cv-01459.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

3 days, 15 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.