legal-news

Jacqueline Stevenson et al v. County of San Bernardino et al

24-cv-00453
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

A compel deposition motion was filed in the case of Jacqueline Stevenson et al v. County of San Bernardino et al, with docket number 24-cv-00453. The motion was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. This development indicates that the plaintiff is seeking to compel the defendant to produce evidence or testimony, and the court will now consider the motion.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • compel deposition motion
  • docket number 24-cv-00453
  • U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other April 22, 2026

5:25-cv-01293 Sean Milo Rodriguez v. County Sheriff of San Bernardino et al

The County of San Bernardino was ordered to compel the deposition of a witness in a separate case, Sean Milo Rodriguez v. County Sheriff of San Bernardino et al. This means the county must take steps to ensure the witness is available for questioning. The deposition is likely related to the case Jacqueline Stevenson et al v. County of San Bernardino et al.

info
Other April 22, 2026

5:24-cv-00453 Jacqueline Stevenson et al v. County of San Bernardino et al

The court issued a scheduling notice in the case of Jacqueline Stevenson et al v. County of San Bernardino et al, indicating that a schedule has been set for the case. This notice is a routine procedural step in the litigation process. The specific details of the schedule are not provided in the notice.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

52 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.