civil-litigation settlement federal-courts court-watch

Jacklynmarie Rios v. General Motors LLC

25-cv-07196 S.D.N.Y.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Jacklynmarie Rios settled her lawsuit against General Motors LLC in the Southern District of New York. A mediation report was filed confirming the settlement. The case is effectively resolved pending dismissal or final orders.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Settlement
  • Mediation report
  • Case resolution
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D.N.Y.

Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:25-cv-07196 Derounian v. Sopp et al

Other · Apr 28, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

3 articles

3 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 2 Plaintiffs

5 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 28, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes General Motors LLC, 2:25-cv-07196 Jacklynmarie Rios, 1:25-cv-07196 Derounian and others.

Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 3 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 1 day, 20 hours ago

Jacklynmarie Rios v. General Motors LLC is an active civil matter in Southern District of New York under docket 25-cv-07196.

The dispute currently identifies 1:25-cv-07196 Derounian and 2:25-cv-07196 Jacklynmarie Rios on one side and General Motors LLC on the other. The case is currently organized around Mediation Report (ADR-3), Completely Settled, Unknown Court.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On April 28, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Notice of Appearance was filed. On April 27, 2026, the docket recorded a other: General Motors LLC has filed a Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures in the case of Singh et al v. General Motors LLC (3:26-cv-03595).

This filing is a routine disclosure of the company's interests in the. On April 27, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The parties reported a settlement.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
info
Other April 28, 2026

1:25-cv-07196 Derounian v. Sopp et al

A Notice of Appearance was filed.

info
Other April 27, 2026

3:26-cv-03595 Singh et al v. General Motors LLC

General Motors LLC has filed a Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures in the case of Singh et al v. General Motors LLC (3:26-cv-03595). This filing is a routine disclosure of the company's interests in the case. The filing is relevant to the case because it provides transparency about General Motors' involvement.

info
Other April 27, 2026

2:25-cv-07196 Jacklynmarie Rios v. General Motors LLC et al

The parties reported a settlement.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

3 outlets · 3 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

3 hours, 14 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.