legal-news

Incinia Contracting Sues Evanston Insurance in Coverage Dispute

23-cv-10917
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Incinia Contracting, Inc. filed suit against Evanston Insurance Company and unnamed co-defendants under docket 23-cv-10917. The court of record is not confirmed in available data. No current summary of the underlying facts has been provided, but the caption suggests a coverage or bad faith dispute between a contractor and its commercial insurer. The specific claims — whether breach of contract, bad faith denial of coverage, or both — are not confirmed by available filings. The case appears to be in active litigation based on the 2023 docket year.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • • Whether Evanston Insurance wrongfully denied or limited coverage
  • • Scope of the applicable policy and any exclusions invoked
  • • Bad faith claims handling under applicable state law
  • • Standing and identity of co-defendants
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 19, 2026

1:23-cv-10917 Incinia Contracting, Inc. v. Evanston Insurance Company et al

A civil action is pending in federal court between Incinia Contracting, Inc. and Evanston Insurance Company, docketed as 1:23-cv-10917. The description filed with this event is blank, leaving the nature of the specific proceeding unclear. Based on the parties, this is likely a coverage dispute — a contractor suing its insurer, a pattern that typically involves a denied claim or a refusal to defend.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

32 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.