legal-news

In the Matter of the Complaint for Exoneration from or limitation of Liability by FUTURE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC and NICOLAS AULAR as beneficial owner of the 1999 Sea Ray 630 Sundancer motor vessel v. All potential claimants against Petitioner and/or the

24-cv-21872
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

In the Matter of the Complaint for Exoneration from or limitation of Liability by FUTURE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC and NICOLAS AULAR as beneficial owner of the 1999 Sea Ray 630 Sundancer motor vessel v. All potential claimants against Petitioner and/or the is a civil case with a current docket number of 24-cv-21872. The case was filed in an unknown court. The current summary of the case is that a utility motion was set/reset deadlines on an unknown date.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • utility motion
  • set/reset deadlines
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 21, 2026

1:24-cv-21872 In the Matter of the Complaint for Exoneration from or limitation of Liability by FUTURE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC and NICOLAS AULAR as beneficial owner of the 1999 Sea Ray 630 Sundancer motor vessel v. All potential claimants against Petitioner and/or the

The court set or reset deadlines in the case of Future Management Company LLC and Nicolas Aular, beneficial owner of the 1999 Sea Ray 630 Sundancer motor vessel, seeking exoneration from or limitation of liability. This means the court is managing the timeline for potential claimants to file their claims against the vessel's owners. The exact deadlines are not specified in this event.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 hour, 31 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.