5:20-cv-06326 In re CIM-SQ TRANSFER CASES
Stipulation and Proposed Order ( 425
The CIM-SQ transfer cases have filed a stipulation and order in federal court. The stipulation and order were filed in the unknown court with docket number 20-cv-06326. The current summary of the case is a stipulation and proposed order.
Latest development
Order · April 23, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingCourt
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
5:20-cv-06326 In re CIM-SQ TRANSFER CASES
Order · Apr 24, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated April 24, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
In re CIM-SQ TRANSFER CASES: Order Filed is an active civil matter in Northern District of California under docket 20-cv-06326.
The case is currently organized around stipulation, federal court, proposed order.
The CIM-SQ transfer cases have filed a stipulation and order in federal court. The stipulation and order were filed in the unknown court with docket number 20-cv-06326. The current summary of the case is a stipulation and proposed order.
On April 24, 2026, the docket recorded a order: The court issued an order.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest order produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The court issued an order.
Stipulation and Proposed Order ( 425
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
7 hours, 18 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.