civil-litigation government-litigation federal-courts court-watch

HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION

25-cv-03921 S.D.N.Y.
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION is a case with docket number 25-cv-03921. The case involves HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER and UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION. The current status of the case is Status Report ( 21.

Latest development

1:22-cv-02891 Emery Celli Brinckerhoff Abady Ward & Maazel LLP v. United States Customs and Border Protection

Order · April 27, 2026

The parties filed a joint status report.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • • Docket number 25-cv-03921
  • • HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER
  • • UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D.N.Y.

Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:22-cv-02891 Emery Celli Brinckerhoff Abady Ward & Maazel LLP v. United States Customs and Border Protection

Order · Apr 27, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

2 Defendants, 2 Plaintiffs

4 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated April 27, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, United States Customs and Border Protection, 1:25-cv-03921 HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 11 hours, 3 minutes ago

HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION is an active civil matter in Southern District of New York under docket 25-cv-03921.

The dispute currently identifies 1:22-cv-02891 Emery Celli Brinckerhoff Abady Ward & Maazel LLP and 1:25-cv-03921 HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER on one side and UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and United States Customs and Border Protection on the other. The case is currently organized around Docket number 25-cv-03921, HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION.

UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION is a case with docket number 25-cv-03921. The case involves HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER and UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION. The current status of the case is Status Report ( 21.

On April 27, 2026, the docket recorded a order: The parties filed a joint status report.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest order produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
gavel
Order April 27, 2026

1:22-cv-02891 Emery Celli Brinckerhoff Abady Ward & Maazel LLP v. United States Customs and Border Protection

The parties filed a joint status report.

description View filing open_in_new
gavel
Order April 27, 2026

1:25-cv-03921 HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION

The parties filed a joint status report.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

11 hours, 3 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.