1:21-cv-23448 Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
Notice of Attorney Appearance ( 54
1:21-cv-23448 Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
S.D. Fla.
Southern District of Florida · 11th Circuit · FL
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:21-cv-23448 Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
Other · May 04, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Southern District of Florida, a federal district court in FL.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 04, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al is an active civil matter in Southern District of Florida under docket 21-cv-23448.
The main identified defendant or respondent is Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, federal courts, court watch.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 4, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Notice of Attorney Appearance was filed.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla.) is a federal district court in the 11th Circuit, FL.
A Notice of Attorney Appearance was filed.
Notice of Attorney Appearance ( 54
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
13 hours, 2 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.