3:20-cv-07208 Herships v. State of California Superior Court et al
USCA Memorandum ( 154
Herships v. State of California Superior Court et al is a civil case in the Northern District of California with a docket number of 20-cv-07208. Herships has filed a lawsuit against the State of California Superior Court et al in the case 20-cv-07208. The current status of the case is USCA Memorandum. The court has issued a memorandum regarding the case. The memorandum is not specified in the current summary, and there may be ongoing issues or disputes.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:20-cv-07208 Herships v. State of California Superior Court et al
Other · Apr 27, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
1 linked entity
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 27, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes State of California Superior Court.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Herships v. State of California Superior Court et al is an active appellate matter in Northern District of California under docket 20-cv-07208.
The dispute currently identifies 3:20-cv-07208 Herships on one side and State of California Superior Court on the other. The case is currently organized around State of California Superior Court et al.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 27, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a memorandum in the case of Herships v. State of California Superior Court et al, affirming a lower court's decision. The memorandum is a non-precedential opinion, meaning it does not set a binding legal.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a memorandum in the case of Herships v. State of California Superior Court et al, affirming a lower court's decision. The memorandum is a non-precedential opinion, meaning it does not set a binding legal precedent. This decision is significant because it upholds the lower court's ruling.
USCA Memorandum ( 154
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
3 days, 9 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.