legal-news

Hernandez et al v. Surechoice Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange

26-cv-14070
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Hernandez et al v. Surechoice Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange is a civil case with a notice filed in the court. The docket number is 26-cv-14070. The current summary is a notice with 27 documents attached. The case is currently in the initial stages of litigation.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • • Notice
  • • Surechoice Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

5 events
info
Other April 24, 2026

9:09-cr-80062-4 USA v. Hernandez et al

A Notice of Reassignment of Closed Case was filed.

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other April 24, 2026

9:09-cr-80062-3 USA v. Hernandez et al

A Notice of Reassignment of Closed Case was filed.

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other April 24, 2026

9:09-cr-80062-2 USA v. Hernandez et al

A Notice of Reassignment of Closed Case was filed.

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other April 24, 2026

9:09-cr-80062-1 USA v. Hernandez et al

A Notice of Reassignment of Closed Case was filed.

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other April 24, 2026

2:26-cv-14070 Hernandez et al v. Surechoice Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange

The court issued a notice in the Hernandez et al v. Surechoice Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange case, indicating that a non-standard filing has been made. This notice is a procedural step that alerts parties to the filing. The notice does not provide further details on the filing's contents.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

5 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 5 articles

Timeline events

5 records on file

Last updated

4 hours, 39 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.