1:26-cv-11624 Henkel v. Iron Oak, Inc. et al
Notice of Service of Process ( 6
Henkel v. Iron Oak, Inc. et al is a civil case with docket number 26-cv-11624. The court is unspecified. The most recent filing is a notice of service of process, showing that the defendants have been formally notified of the lawsuit.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:26-cv-11624 Henkel v. Iron Oak, Inc. et al
Other · Apr 30, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 30, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Iron Oak, Inc and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Henkel v. Iron Oak, Inc. et al is an active civil matter under docket 26-cv-11624.
The main identified defendant or respondent is Iron Oak, Inc. The case is currently organized around Unknown court, Docket number 26-cv-11624, Notice of service of process.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Notice of Service of Process was filed.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
A Notice of Service of Process was filed.
Notice of Service of Process ( 6
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.