Havrilla et al sue Centene Corporation in Northern District of Illinois civil case
Case Summary
Havrilla and other plaintiffs initiated a civil suit against Centene Corporation in the Northern District of Illinois under docket 22-cv-04126. The case is under watch with no detailed filings or rulings available yet.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Insurance practices
- • Breach of fiduciary duty
- • Consumer protection
- • Class action potential
Docket Snapshot
Court
N.D. Ill.
Northern District of Illinois · 7th Circuit · IL
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:22-cv-04126 Havrilla et al v. Centene Corporation et al
Other · May 14, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of Illinois, a federal district court in IL.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 14, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Centene Corporation and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.) is a federal district court in the 7th Circuit, IL.
Case Timeline
1 event1:22-cv-04126 Havrilla et al v. Centene Corporation et al
The case Havrilla et al v. Centene Corporation et al was filed in the Northern District of Illinois under docket number 22-cv-04126. Currently, there are no significant filings or rulings to report, so the case is being monitored for future developments. This means there is no actionable information yet for attorneys tracking this litigation.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
10 hours, 20 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.