1:16-cv-08075 Havlish v. Clearstream Banking, S.A. et al
Notice Regarding Deficient Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice
The court issued a notice identifying a deficient motion to appear pro hac vice in Havlish v. Clearstream Banking, S.A. et al., docket 16-cv-08075. The deficiency concerns the attorney's application to appear in the case.
Latest development
Motion · April 29, 2026
A Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice was filed.
description View filingCourt
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Motion practice
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:16-cv-08075 Havlish v. Clearstream Banking, S.A. et al
Motion · Apr 29, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a motion dated April 29, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Clearstream Banking, S.A and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Havlish v. Clearstream Banking, S.A. et al is an active civil matter under docket 16-cv-08075.
The main identified defendant or respondent is Clearstream Banking, S.A. The case is currently organized around Deficient Motion, Pro Hac Vice.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 29, 2026, the docket recorded a motion: A Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice was filed.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest motion produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
A Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice was filed.
Notice Regarding Deficient Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
17 hours, 41 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.