District of New Jersey case filed by Goulet et al against Bally's Atlantic City Casino and Hotel
Case Summary
Goulet et al. filed a civil lawsuit against Bally's Atlantic City Casino and Hotel in the District of New Jersey, docket number 25-cv-13640. The case involves claims presumably related to the casino's operations or contractual disputes, though specific allegations are not detailed in the docket summary. The litigation is in its initial phase without publicly available substantive filings.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Casino liability
- • Contractual disputes
Docket Snapshot
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:25-cv-13640 GOULET et al v. BALLY'S ATLANTIC CITY CASINO AND HOTEL
Other · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
1 linked entity
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes BALLY'S ATLANTIC CITY CASINO RESORT.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
Case Timeline
1 event1:25-cv-13640 GOULET et al v. BALLY'S ATLANTIC CITY CASINO AND HOTEL
The case Goulet et al v. Bally's Atlantic City Casino and Hotel was filed under docket number 1:25-cv-13640. This event marks the initiation of litigation involving the plaintiffs and Bally's Casino. The filing signals the start of legal proceedings that could impact the parties' rights and obligations.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day, 2 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.