Gichanga v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
Case Summary
The court issued a Clerk's Notice in the case Gichanga v. United States Department of Homeland Security, docket number 4:25-cv-10010. This notice typically informs parties of procedural updates or administrative actions. It matters because it may affect deadlines or next steps in the litigation.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Docket Snapshot
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:26-cv-12149 Thakur et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security
Other · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Government Agency, 2 Plaintiffs
5 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes United States Department of Homeland Security, 4:25-cv-10010 Gichanga, 3:17-cv-05211 Regents of University of California and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
3 events1:26-cv-12149 Thakur et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security
A Summons was issued.
3:17-cv-05211 Regents of University of California et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
Notice of Appearance/Substitution/Change/Withdrawal of Attorney
4:25-cv-10010 Gichanga v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
The court issued a Clerk's Notice in the case Gichanga v. United States Department of Homeland Security, docket number 4:25-cv-10010. This notice typically informs parties of procedural updates or administrative actions. It matters because it may affect deadlines or next steps in the litigation.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
52 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.