1:23-cv-10451 Germosen v. Homegoods, Inc. et al
in Opposition to Motion ( 54 )
Germosen has filed a motion in opposition in their case against Homegoods, Inc. The court has not yet ruled on this motion. The details of the opposition are not specified.
Latest development
Motion · April 22, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingCourt
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Motion practice
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:23-cv-10451 Germosen v. Homegoods, Inc. et al
Motion · Apr 23, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a motion dated April 23, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Homegoods, Inc, 1:23-cv-10451 Germosen.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Germosen Sues Homegoods, Inc. et al is an active civil matter in Southern District of New York under docket 23-cv-10451.
The dispute currently identifies 1:23-cv-10451 Germosen on one side and Homegoods, Inc on the other. The case is currently organized around Motion in opposition, Court consideration, Ongoing case.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 23, 2026, the docket recorded a motion: A Motion was filed.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest motion produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
A Motion was filed.
in Opposition to Motion ( 54 )
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
9 hours, 41 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.