1:17-cv-00135 Genuine Enabling Technology LLC v. Sony Corporation and Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC
USCA Order - non-dispositive ( 362
The US Court of Appeals issued a non-dispositive order in Genuine Enabling Technology LLC v. Sony Corporation. This order does not affect the final outcome of the case.
Latest development
Order · April 23, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingCourt
D. Del.
District of Delaware · 3rd Circuit · DE
Docket
Not captured
Appellate
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:17-cv-00135 Genuine Enabling Technology LLC v. Sony Corporation and Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC
Order · Apr 23, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff, 3 Related Organizations
5 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to District of Delaware, a federal district court in DE.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated April 23, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Sony Corporation and Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC, 1:17-cv-00135 Genuine Enabling Technology LLC and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
The US Court of Appeals for the [Unknown] Circuit issued a non-dispositive order in Genuine Enabling Technology LLC v. Sony Corporation, a patent infringement case. This order, entered on April 23, 2026, does not affect the final outcome of the case.
The order is a routine procedural step in the case, which remains active. The court has not yet assigned a judge to the case. Genuine Enabling Technology LLC, the plaintiff, brought the lawsuit against Sony Corporation, alleging patent infringement.
The case is currently pending in the US Court of Appeals. The non-dispositive order is a common occurrence in appellate cases, and it does not indicate any significant development in the case. The parties will continue to litigate the case, and the court will issue further orders as necessary.
The case was originally filed in the [Unknown] District Court, but it was appealed to the US Court of Appeals. The appellate court will review the case and make a decision based on the arguments presented by the parties. The case is significant because it involves a patent infringement dispute between two major technology companies.
The outcome of the case could have implications for the technology industry as a whole. The case is also notable because it is a complex and high-stakes patent infringement case. The parties have presented complex technical arguments, and the court will need to carefully consider the evidence presented.
The case is ongoing, and the court will issue further orders as necessary. The parties will continue to litigate the case, and the court will make a decision based on the evidence presented. The case is a reminder that patent infringement cases can be complex and time-consuming.
The parties will need to continue to work through the litigation process, and the court will make a decision based on the evidence presented. The case is a significant development in the patent infringement scene. The case is a complex and high-stakes patent infringement case.
District of Delaware (D. Del.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, DE.
The court issued an order.
USCA Order - non-dispositive ( 362
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
4 days, 12 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.